Table Of Contents
TypesÂ
According to the American political scientist Robert D. Putnam, there are two components or types of social capital – bonding and bridging. Another researcher Daniel P. Aldrich described a third type, the linking capital.
- Bonding capital – This type is formed between homogenous groups of people, i.e., people with the same objectives and tasks. For example, people who work in the same organization can bond and form an association.
- Bridging capital – In this type, a relationship is formed between heterogeneous groups. That is, the mainstream interests might be different, but there can be some commonalities. A dance group and a band partnering to conduct an event can be an example.
- Linking capital – This is the bond or relationship between a citizen and a government official or bonds between people at different levels of power hierarchies.
ExamplesÂ
The following examples will give a better idea of the topic:
Example #1
Consider a market for books. There are three market leaders – publishers, P, Q, and R. The market has smaller publishers, too, accounting for less than 3% of the market share. However, Z, a new entrant in the market, introduced a new publishing model that would maximize the authors' profits.
The model also aimed to convert readers or buyers into more than just customers and set up online groups and meetings where people could join and communicate. Slowly, publisher Z started setting up outlets where people could meet physically and network. The outlets worked like communities where people could stay for as long as they wanted to, and they even served food to the customers.
Hence, the publisher, Z, was building social capital where like-minded people could meet and bond.
Example #2
A new study published in the New York Times shows that friendships between the rich and the poor can reduce poverty levels. The study analyzed 72 million people (almost 84% of the population from 25 to 44 years) in the United States and their Facebook friendships.
The study was able to explain why some neighborhoods were able to perform well and climb up the income ladder. It established that if poorer children grew up in communities where almost 70% of their friends or social groups were wealthy, the poorer children were more likely to make a 20% higher income.
The researchers of the study found that this 'economic connectedness' had a more profound effect on the kids than other factors like school, family, etc. Thus, even if not conscious, networking positively influences a class of society.
Advantages And DisadvantagesÂ
Social capital has many benefits, which is why it is popular. It helps a group of people voice their concerns, share information, and build relationships and trust. In addition, social networking can help improve an individual's contacts and help them in the future.
Especially in an organization, it can help increase employees' productivity and facilitate open communication. Similarly, in non-professional areas, like neighborhoods or residential communities, it can also ensure a community's safety and security concerns.
On the other hand, the demerits of such a type of association can be pretty serious. The best examples mentioned in such a case are drug cartels, mafia, and gangs, which can harm certain groups of people. This is because they can exert their power and take unlawful and unethical measures. Another common example is established organizations in a market barring entry to new competitors. This is known as negative social capital.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
According to the theory of social capital, social relationships between similar or like-minded people can become valuable assets to community members who voluntarily come together. The aim of such capital is to exchange information and collaborate resources, thus increasing overall productivity and efficiency.
Voluntary social networks built by people are mostly not formal organizations or associations. Instead, they are social groups or communities that add to the capital through networking, word-of-mouth, etc. Existing members are added to the network when they identify other potential members.
Since social capital is based on relationships and doesn't have any direct financial or economic implication or correlation, it is not possible to measure it. However, some commonly practiced and simultaneously debatable methods include measuring the group size, the level of trust, and cohesion between members.
Recommended Articles
This article has been a guide to Social Capital & its definition. We explain its examples, advantages, disadvantages, & comparison with cultural & human capital. You can learn more about it from the following articles –
Social Capital DefinitionÂ
Social capital is now of huge significance in private and professional circles. Even business organizations and employees are using it to accomplish shared tasks. However, though mostly advantageous, such a network does have its disadvantages. This can prove negative to many other sections of society.
Table of contents