Table Of Contents
Explanation
The concentration on only the shareholders in shareholder primacy has been debated a lot. There are debates regarding the corporation's duty towards the environment and consumers, but shareholder primacy only focuses on the wealth creation of shareholders. So the governance stipulates rules for accepting projects with the highest NPV, even if that project is not environment friendly. The governance also focuses on charging the maximum competitive price to customers, increasing shareholders' wealth.
Advantages
- Governance allows the maximum wealth creation of shareholders. Shareholders are considered the owner of a corporation, and shareholder primacy protects their interests. Shareholders take the maximum risk, so they should get the maximum wealth creation.
- As the earnings of the company increase, so the share price also increases, which helps shareholders to sell shares at a higher price. Capital gains are taxed at low rates. So it is beneficial for the shareholders.
- Shareholder primacy forces management to focus on profit maximization, which should be the ultimate goal of the management. The corporation needs profit to survive.
- Companies opt for projects with the highest NPVs, so the chances of the project failing are less.
Disadvantages
- Most of the profits are distributed due to a high payout ratio, so are fewer retained earnings. The growth of the corporation is hampered.
- Management gets so involved in maximizing EPS that it accepts projects with huge short-term and low long-term benefits. This affects long-term profitability.
Conclusion
Shareholders' primacy is an outlook that portrays shareholders as the corporation's owners and other stakeholders are not so important. So the management's attention should be to protecting shareholders' wealth. Other stakeholders are not considered. This conduct is debatable and has been criticized on many platforms. Many believe that shareholders should be the ultimate owners as they take the full risk.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
The stockholders' priority still needs to be regulated by law. People in much of the globe maintain that shareholders come first. Most often, rather than "law," shareholder primacy is called the "norm."
Common law articulates shareholder primacy in court precedents stating that managers and directors owe fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders and must make choices in their best interests (Smith, 1998). The 1919 case of Dodge v. United States is when the standard was most famously stated.
The director primacy agrees. According to the principle of shareholder primacy, the shareholders should have ultimate decision-making authority regarding corporate governance. Director primacy, in this case, indicates no. The board of directors' management is unassigned and original.
Yes, there has been a growing movement to reevaluate the role of corporations in society. Some companies and investors have begun to adopt more socially responsible practices, acknowledging the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors.
Recommended Articles
This has been a guide to what is Shareholder Primacy and its definition. Here we discuss criticism, background, and is shareholder primacy legally mandated, along with advantages and disadvantages. You may learn more about financing from the following articles –