Table Of Contents
Negative Income Tax is a refund system by the government where individuals earning below a specific limit receive a monetary amount on tax filing. The prime purpose of this system is to provide a source of income to financially low-income families.
This tax system got popularized in the mid-19th century. As a result, people became more active in the tax-filing process. In addition, it played a vital role in closing the poverty bridges. Also, they got a subsidized benefit on their incomes. The government has access to personal tax claims. However, businesses and individuals have created loopholes in the system.
Key Takeaways
Negative Income Tax, also known as net operation loss (NOL), allows individuals to earn a subsidized amount on taxable earnings. American economist Milton Friedman first proposed this system in 1962. According to the system, only certain income groups can access this income. Individuals qualifying for the negative income tax program will receive the benefit. However, it discouraged people from working.
The idea of this tax is traceable back to the 1960s. In 1962, economist Milton Friedman proposed the concept in the book "Capitalism and Freedom." Later, in 1965, another economist, Robert Lampman, popularized the idea of a net operation loss rate. Lampman argued that the government should provide welfare benefits to two-parent families and single people.
By the end of the 20th century, economists Vilfredo Pareto, James Tobin, Joseph A. Pechman, Peter M. Mieszkowski, and Abram Bergson supported it. Likewise, Michael Boskin, Christopher Green, and Paul Samuelson clearly defined the negative income tax graph. As a result, U.S. President Richard Nixon, along with the support of economists, added a negative income levy as a part of the Family Assistance Plan in 1969. Likewise, along with the United States, even Canada became a part of a net operating loss (NOL) program.
This theory is a mirror reflection of the existing tax system. For example, Friedman's negative income tax theory states a few benefits that can influence the global economy. Let us look at them:
Let us look at the formula to calculate this tax for a better understanding:
Negative income tax (tr) = t (y - xk)
Where tr = transfer amount by the government to the taxpayer
y = market income (taxable income)
t = net operation loss (NOL) rate
xk = minimum income limit set by the government
While y depends on the individual's income, the government pre-decides the t and xk. However, Friedman suggested that the rate be not more than 50%. And the limit should be around $10,000. Likewise, the formula helped in understanding the negative income tax graph.
Suppose a family has net annual earnings of $8500, and the negative income tax rate is 35%. So, as per the formula, the calculation appears as follows:
Negative income tax = 35% (8500 - 10,000)
= 35% (1500)
= $525
The Friedman negative income tax system was supposed to cut down poverty. During 1968 and 1980, the Federal (U.S.) government devised an experiment on this tax. Economists referred to them as income maintenance, guaranteed income, or net operation loss experiments. The government conducted five experiments within a group of 983-4800 participants.
As a result, areas like New Jersey, Carolina, Seattle, Denver, Gary, and Indiana had a reduced poverty line. However, the NIT system reduced the number of hours worked by married and single people by 20-30%.
This tax was a boon for below-poverty-line families. The government, as well as society, benefitted from the program. The former had access to the tax filings of the individuals. As a result, people became reluctant (active) to file their income tax returns. As a result, a net operation loss system costs relatively lower than other welfare programs. However, there were specific cons related to it.
To fall under the low-income group, individuals started dropping their work. As a result, they showed misleading figures in their tax returns. In contrast, some economists felt that the NIT program increased the costs of the government budget. Also, it added no extra value to the pre-existing welfare programs.
| Pros | Cons |
| Reduced poverty | This led to increased program costs. |
| Financial support to low-income groups | Already existing welfare plans. |
| Provided tax relief to taxpayers | Reduction in work productivity |
| Cost-saving welfare program | |
| Access to individual tax filings |
Although net operation loss (NIT) and Universal basic income (UBI) provide welfare, they differ slightly. The former tries to provide financial support to low-income groups. However, the latter aims at the universal radar, providing an amount to everyone.
Moreover, while the former originated in the mid-20th century, the latter prevailed during the 16th century. Lately (2020), American businessman Andrew Yang has focused more on applying the latter.
| Key Points | Negative Income | Universal Basic Income |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Meaning | It is a tax credit initiated by the U.S government. | It is a tax credit initiated by the U.S government. |
| 2. Origin | 1962 | 1962 |
| 3. Purpose | To reduce poverty in the country. | To reduce poverty in the country. |
| 4. Founder | Economist Milton Friedman | Economist Milton Friedman |
