Model Audit

Model Audit refers to examining and evaluating a financial model's reliability, accuracy, and effectiveness to help a firm with decision-making. It verifies if the financial models used by a firm are correct, reliable, and appropriate and align with regulatory requirements.

Financial forecasts are typically reviewed during financial model audits before being approved for implementation. These audits assure stakeholders of the reliability and correctness of outcomes (presented in financial terms). It also helps identify and mitigate biases, limitations, and errors in the financial models used or proposed for use. Typically, financial firms and banking organizations use business model audits to estimate if a particular activity or project will be profitable.

• A model audit involves scrutinizing and assessing the dependability, precision, and efficacy of a financial model employed by a company while making business decisions. 
• It aims to guarantee a financial model's accuracy, reliability, and suitability in light of regulatory requirements.
• These audits can be categorized into four types: Compliance Audit, Risk Audit, Performance Audit, and Process Audit.
• These audits benefit companies by allowing them to check the viability of their plans. 
• The audit evaluates model governance framework, development process, performance and accuracy, implementation and controls, documentation and compliance with relevant rules, laws, and standards.

Model Audit is defined in the financial context as a process that examines the appropriateness, reliability, and accuracy of the financial models deployed by a firm to support its strategic planning, forecasting, valuation, and risk assessment goals. It plays a key role in guaranteeing the effectiveness and integrity of financial models and in decision-making and risk management. Through such audits, auditors help stakeholders, such as investors, regulators, and management, gain confidence about the effectiveness and reliability of business decisions and risk control practices.

The process offers various benefits like a higher level of transparency, enhanced regulatory compliance, improved risk control policy, and increased confidence in financial model outcomes. It also leads to process improvements and indicates areas for improvement in a financial model. A financial model audit helps uncover weaknesses or limitations in financial models that may adversely impact decisions or judgments about changes or adjustments needed in an organization. Such findings are reported in a model audit report.

This can be a time-consuming process that demands professional opinion and guidance. Hence, it may prove quite resource-intensive. These audits may not fully remove errors or future problems. It is possible to become complacent when results of such audits are favorable. However, real-world situations may change or be affected by factors a company may be unable to anticipate.

The scope of model audits has been described below:

• Model Governance: It refers to assessing a firm's entire financial control and administration framework. Model governance includes documentation, process control & monitoring, and new model development and implementation.
• Model Development Process: It talks about the methodology used to develop a model audit plan, including design, process, data collection, algorithms and variables selection, and validation techniques.
• Model Input Data: At this stage, the accuracy, quality, and completeness of data are evaluated. Data sources, data transformation techniques, data governance practices, and data processing methods are scrutinized.
• Model Assumptions and Limitations: Model audit plans must verify if the study assumptions are appropriate, relevant, and reasonable. Various limitations and constraints associated with the model are considered.
• Model Performance and Accuracy: It also helps examine audit performance in terms of precision. Model output is compared with anticipated real-world results or benchmarks to generate consistent and reliable predictions.
• Model Implementation and Controls: The audit assesses the manner in which the model will be implemented at the firm to ensure data integrity and process control.
• Model Validation and Backtesting: The auditor looks at the methods used to validate the model, including backtesting, stress testing, sensitivity analysis, and model recalibration processes. The goal is to evaluate the model's reliability and durability under diverse market and economic conditions.
• Model Documentation and Communication: The audit assesses the relevance and utility of a model's documentation, including its objectives, extent, structure, underlying assumptions, constraints, and findings. It also evaluates how the model's outputs and related risks are communicated to stakeholders, such as management, regulators, and model users.
• Compliance and Regulatory Requirements: The auditor confirms that the model conforms to all relevant rules, laws, and standards. This may entail checking compliance with laws governing data protection, financial reporting requirements, risk management guidelines, or restrictions particular to a certain industry.

According to the purpose of the audit or based on the emphasis required on specific aspects of projects, model audits may be divided into four types. They have been explained below:

• Compliance Audit: This model audit investigates compliance with pertinent laws, rules, and industry standards. Its goal is to confirm whether the model adheres to the precise specifications of governing or regulatory agencies.
• Risk Audit: This examines the risks associated with a model is the main focus of a risk audit. It comprises the discovery and assessment of potential hazards, including model flaws, data reliability issues, or restrictions in the model's underlying assumptions. The goal is to provide suggestions for efficiently reducing and managing these risks.
• Performance Audit: Performance audits examine a model's effectiveness and productivity. They evaluate how well the model achieves the required objectives and produces accurate and sound outcomes. The audit may involve comparing the output to defined benchmarks or actual outcomes to assess the model's performance.
• Process Audit: The model creation and implementation process is examined through process audits. It assesses the controls put in place throughout a model's life cycle. It also evaluates the governance architecture, documentation, validation methods, and controls. The main goal is to confirm that the model creation procedure follows industry best practices, encourages transparency, and includes the necessary checks and balances.

Let us discuss two examples to understand the topic.

Example #1

Let us assume the following scenario. During a model audit, ABC Bank's credit risk model was evaluated by XYZ Audit Firm based in New York City. The audit assessed the precision and dependability of the model's forecasts, confirming compliance with legal standards and risk mitigation techniques selected to combat probable issues. Thus, the results can boost stakeholders’ confidence in the bank's risk management procedures.

Example #2

Assume PQR Audit Services, an asset management company, performed this audit of its client John Doe Investments based in London. The performance attribution methodology (a method that measures how portfolio managers make decisions under different circumstances to deliver the best results to investors) the business used to evaluate investment portfolios was the subject of the audit. The goal was to evaluate how well the model worked for attributing returns, identifying performance sources, and improving client reporting and capacity for decision-making.

This article has been a guide to What Is Model Audit. Here, we explain the topic in detail with its scope, categories, and examples. You may also find some useful articles here -

• Model Audit Rule
• Audit Risk Model
• Audit Risk