Cost Principle

Last Updated :

-

Blog Author :

Edited by :

Reviewed by :

Table Of Contents

arrow

What Is Cost Principle?

Cost Principle states that an asset should always be recorded at the original buying price or cost and not the perceived value. Therefore, any changes in the asset’s market value should not affect how they are represented on the balance sheet.

What Is Cost Principle

The cost principle is an important aspect that businesses must follow when it comes to maintaining financial statements. It makes it mandatory for businesses to record raw asset prices, which marks its very original cost, unadjusted against any improvement or depreciation or with respect to the market value.

Cost Principle Explained

A cost principle concept revolves around a significant aspect, which requires companies to record the prices of the assets that is equal to what their actual cost was at the time of purchase. This cost is not adjusted to any expense, be it the improvements done, or depreciation occurred. Plus, it ignores any kind of inflation in the value of the asset.

Financial investment should not be booked as per the cost principle. Instead, its value should get changed in each accounting period as per market value. In simple words, the financial records may get influenced enough to change the worth of the asset as per the improvement, depreciation, inflation, or other costs, including the market value, but the cost principle records still remain the same. This is what also makes it known as historical cost principle.

As per the Cost Principle in accounting, asset value should not get changed, but GAAP allows the asset value to change based on their fair value. This can be done using asset impairment also. It is also known as the "historical cost principle." The historical Cost Principle is better suited for short-term assets since their values don’t get changed much in a short time. For a fixed asset, accountants use depreciation, amortization, and impairment, etc.

Examples

Let us consider the following instances to understand the cost principle definition and its working:

Example #1

Let’s say your firm has bought a machine. At the time of acquisition, the machine's original cost was $100,000. Based on your business experience, you know that this machine can only work for the next ten years, and its value will be nil. So, initially, your fixed asset will get debited (increased by $100,000, and cash will get credited by $100,000.

ParticularsDebitCredit
Fixed Asset$100,000
Cash$100,000

The machine will work for only ten years, which means its fair value gets depreciated each year. So, next year, your accountant can use straight-line depreciation and divide asset value by 10 to get depreciation value as $10,000 for each year. Next year, accounting for the asset will be the following:

ParticularsAmount
Machine$100,000
Depreciation$10,000
Net Machine$90,000

There are other ways, such as impairment. Let’s say a company bought another company for $1 million. But after five years, the value of the acquired company suddenly dropped by half due to an issue. Then based on accounting principles, this company's value can be impaired based on the current value.

Example #2

Let us study two practical examples related to the cost principle.

cost principle example

Google acquisition of YouTube

The first cost principle accounting example is the Google acquisition of YouTube. In 2006, Google bought YouTube for $1.65 billion as one of the most significant tech acquisitions. As per Cost Principle in the book of Google, the value of YouTube will be shown as $1.65 billion.

cost principle example 1

source: nytimes.com

However, years after the acquisition, YouTube's value increased by many folds because of its popularity, and its base increased because of the rise in internet users and net speed. But in the books of Google, its value remains at $1.65 billion. Usually, if the asset's fair value is higher, then companies won’t increase the value of the asset.

Infosys acquisition of Panaya and Skava

Now let us take Infosys' acquisition of Panaya and Skava. In Feb 2015, Infosys bought two companies, 'Panaya’ and ‘Skava,' for USD 340 million. Since the closing of the acquisition, Infosys has struggled with this deal. Many allegations were thrown around about the deal, which has hampered these companies' profiles because the fair value was reduced significantly.

cost principle example 1-1

source: infosys.com

In 2018, Infosys started reducing the value of these companies using additional amortization and depreciation. As of now, the current value of Panaya and Skava is shown as $206 million in Infosys books. This case shows that companies need to assess their assets regularly and fairly. If asset market value is going down, then in the books, their value needs to be reduced by additional depreciation, amortization, or asset impairment.

Advantages

Cost principle is one of the most vital elements of accounting as it helps companies to record the initial price at which an asset was bought. Let us have a look at the advantages of the cost principle:

  • Since assets need to be recorded at cost price hence, it is very easy to use. One just need to enter the cost of the asset in accounting books.
  • Since asset value is recorded as per books, that cost can be rallied back from the invoice or any other means. Hence, it can be easily verifiable.
  • Since this is very easy to use, it is a much cheaper way to record the journal entries.

Disadvantages

Cost Principle in accounting is easy to implement and cheap, but it has few limitations in terms of the fair value of an asset. Listed below are some of the limitations that one must know before implementing this principle of accounting:

  • Since asset prices will be changed over the years, this method is not the accurate one as it does not show the asset's fair value.
  • This method also doesn’t show the value of intangible assets example, goodwill, customer value, etc. which could be a very crucial aspect of the asset. These intangible assets add a lot of value of the asset over time.
  • If a company wants to sell its asset at that time of selling, there can be some confusion arising because the market value of that asset at which the company wants to sell will be quite different from the book value of the asset.
  • This method is most suitable for short term assets.
  • If an asset is highly liquid or has some market value, this method is not applicable. That asset should be listed as a market value rather than a historical cost.
  • The company’s financial investment accounting should not be based on the cost principle. Instead, its value should be changed each accounting period based on market value.